Members of Congress often delegate power to bureaucratic experts, but they fear losing permanent control of the policy. One way Congress has dealt with this problem is to require reauthorization of the program or policy. Cox argues that Congress uses this power selectively, and is more likely to require reauthorization when policy is complex or they do not trust the executive branch. By contrast, reauthorization is less likely to be required when there are large disagreements about policy within Congress. In the process, Cox shows that committees are important independent actors in the legislative process, and that committees with homogenous policy preferences may have an advantage in getting their bills through Congress.
Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more
Members of Congress often delegate power to bureaucratic experts, but they fear losing permanent control of the policy. One way Congress has dealt with this problem is to require reauthorization of the program or policy. Cox argues that Congress uses this power selectively, and is more likely to require reauthorization when policy is complex or they do not trust the executive branch. By contrast, reauthorization is less likely to be required when there are large disagreements about policy within Congress. In the process, Cox shows that committees are important independent actors in the legislative process, and that committees with homogenous policy preferences may have an advantage in getting their bills through Congress.
Imprint | Praeger Publishers Inc |
Country of origin | United States |
Release date | April 2004 |
Availability | Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days |
First published | April 2004 |
Authors | James H. Cox |
Dimensions | 244 x 154 x 18mm (L x W x T) |
Format | Hardcover - Cloth over boards |
Pages | 176 |
Edition | New |
ISBN-13 | 978-0-275-97852-5 |
Barcode | 9780275978525 |
Categories | |
LSN | 0-275-97852-4 |